hey! that’s not labia!

I am watching a movie called “Dead Girl,” which features this truly excellent poster:

Photobucket

My feminist blogs hated it because, spoiler alert, it’s a zombie movie about two teenage boys who repeatedly fuck a zombie girl who is tied down to a table. The feminist blogs call this rape. I am, you may have heard, a bit of a raging feminist. Nonetheless, as I am also a bit of a zombie afficianado, I believe I can say with relative certainty that one cannot rape a zombie.

That’s right. I said that.

The reason you should not fuck your dog is that dogs prefer not to be fucked by people. Same goes for horses, children, blacked-out drunk sorority girls. You shouldn’t fuck things that don’t want you to fuck them: that’s rape. A zombie, I maintain, holds no such preference. One cannot rape a hole in the ground. One cannot rape a Fleshlight. Frankly, one cannot rape a dead body – one can only violate it as a piece of property – it’s basically vandalism to fuck a dead body. And since zombies = dead people, there is no raping of zombies. Ah, sure, okay – that’s slightly untrue. Zombies DO have desires. Zombies desire brains. But that is the ONLY things zombies desire! So, by denying zombies your delicious brains, you are thwarting their wishes and therefore raping them.

Dear everyone, stop raping zombies by not letting them eat your brains. Start fucking them, though. They’re fine with that.

Brought to you by: Totally Reasonable Jessica.

Though, of course – none of this – not their point and not my point – is the point of this movie. This is the point of the movie, from the only blogger who appears to have actually watched the movie. What she is saying here is not some big fancy intellectual thing, and it’s certainly not some very delicate or subtle political thing. It’s totally completely obvious in the movie. These stupid blogs were just obviously working from the trailer and the synopsis and the praise that it got on the indie-movie-circuit (which they just knee-jerk didn’t believe, for some reason: “If there’s anything more disturbing than the material advertising the movie itself, it’s what reviewers have to say about it,” Sociological Images says, in response to a whole heaping ton of praise from people who actually DID watch the movie), and not from having seen it.

It’s annoying when the big famous feminist bloggers are stupid, because they’re what people read. And then, later, of course, the little feminist blogs pick it up and also don’t watch the movie and just repeat it anyway. Grumble grumble etc.

Pfff EDIT: Oh and fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiine…this is totally a different zombie mythology where, yes, this zombie does show a distinct preference not to get raped. She’s also a fast zombie, though, and I don’t believe in those, either, so it’s a stupid zombie mythology. But fine, whatever. She’s getting raped, I guess.

HA and EDIT 2: Doods are randomly sitting in a car, listening to a call-in talk show on a radio station. Annoying man’s voice: “Heyyyyyy…and how old are you?” Woman’s voice: “Twenty-five.” Man’s voice: “And do you have a boyfriend or a husband?” Ugh. Just watch the stupid movie, feminists. Obv.

EDIT 3: Yeah, no, okay. So, first of all, the movie ends with figurative NAKED FEMINIST RAGE ON THE LOOSE! So there’s that. Also, it’s a decent take on the genre. I can’t say I loved it or whatever, but it’s a totally decent revision, and it is 1000% a feminist horror movie, which there aren’t enough of – especially ones like this that don’t proclaim themselves SUPERFEMINISTHORRORMOVIES!!!!! like Teeth or Jennifer’s Body or whatever.

Blah blah.

Tags: , , ,

  1. Isley’s avatar

    Yeah I was wondering…does Jennifer’s Body irritate you with all the “OMG it’s a FEMINIST take on a slasher film! Girls should see this movie now!!!” stuff?

  2. Jessica’s avatar

    It does! Like, it’s annoying to have to ask this question, because I think it tends to be used as a cover for anti-feminist sentiment, but I think it applies here: are they trying to advertise Jennifer’s Body as a great horror movie? or as a great horror movie made by women?

    Diablo Cody keeps claiming that it’s “subversive,” but I think that’s not the right word to use if you keep shouting your intended message from the rooftops. Deadgirl was WAY more subversive, I think, because its message really WAS unexpected. I definitely could see teenage boys going to see this and it slowly dawning on them (or maybe NOT dawning on them EVER, consciously) that the real monsters in this movie are not the zombies, but the guys abusing the zombies. A movie really can only be subversive if you get the right audience to see it – and Diablo keeps saying this movie is for both 14 year old boys AND feminist women, but – will the 14 year old boys see it? I mean, the answer to this is presumably “OMGMEGANFOX,” but will they go see it if some weird-looking 30 year old feminist keeps telling them it’ll be good for them?

    I think the ideal in all of this is for feminist movies to BE mainstream movies, and they can’t be if they’re labeled and sold as “feminist movies.”

    This was rambly as well and I’m not sure what my point was other than, “I want to see Jennifer’s Body! (But I’m not expecting much.)”

  3. kelly’s avatar

    i’d like to rape the poster, if it would let me.

    question, why is rape not more disturbing to men? there is always this conversation about its depiction in relation to women, but what is that kind of scene really saying about the men committing the act? cause, zombie or not, its pretty yucky sounding and makes me question where they locate their moral center.

    really though, the bit of glitter…

  4. AM’s avatar

    “It is 1000% a feminist horror movie, which there aren’t enough of.”

    I wholeheartedly and so completely disagree. Having watched the film, it’s not even remotely a “feminist” movie. Self-defense and vengeance doesn’t qualify as feminist, which is all the zombie manages in the end. Making the rape victim a fictionalized character doesn’t cease to make it a movie glorifying rape and demented boyhood camaraderie.

    The film wasn’t scary or really all that shocking. Just vile, nasty, immature, and ridiculous. This is not art, and this deep “message” everyone speaks of keeps eluding me. What message does this film have aside from proving entertainment options are becoming increasingly depraved and dehumanizing? It’s a film about boys, for boys, by boys. The screenwriter himself admits the idea stemmed from dark fantasies, not a desire for social commentary.